<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seriously?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/04/15/seriously/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/04/15/seriously/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:18:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dc</title>
		<link>http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/04/15/seriously/#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>dc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/?p=711#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>Carol: I gather that you don&#039;t?

I wouldn&#039;t be so sure about Rosenthal. He was more or less my boss for about 6 months. He may be fatuous and self-satisfied, but he&#039;s not pretentious. One reason he can think of Kristol as a serious intellectual is because he probably does not think of himself as an intellectual, and my guess is that he views high brow art and literature with a fair amount of suspicion. I seem to remember that he was an Elmore Leonard fan (not that Elmore Leonard and high brow lit are mutually exclusive, and not that I think &quot;high brow&quot; is a very useful label).

I&#039;ve never read Gessen, or taken more than a quick glance at n+1, so I&#039;ll refrain from taking a position on his seriousness myself. He seems to genuinely care about writing and books, so more power to him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carol: I gather that you don&#8217;t?</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be so sure about Rosenthal. He was more or less my boss for about 6 months. He may be fatuous and self-satisfied, but he&#8217;s not pretentious. One reason he can think of Kristol as a serious intellectual is because he probably does not think of himself as an intellectual, and my guess is that he views high brow art and literature with a fair amount of suspicion. I seem to remember that he was an Elmore Leonard fan (not that Elmore Leonard and high brow lit are mutually exclusive, and not that I think &#8220;high brow&#8221; is a very useful label).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never read Gessen, or taken more than a quick glance at n+1, so I&#8217;ll refrain from taking a position on his seriousness myself. He seems to genuinely care about writing and books, so more power to him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/04/15/seriously/#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/?p=711#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>I bet he thinks Keith Gessen is serious.  (ref. nnyhav&#039;s comment on out-hipstering the hipsters).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet he thinks Keith Gessen is serious.  (ref. nnyhav&#8217;s comment on out-hipstering the hipsters).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wordnerd</title>
		<link>http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/04/15/seriously/#comment-1184</link>
		<dc:creator>wordnerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/?p=711#comment-1184</guid>
		<description>Is SERIOUS a good thing, Mr. Rosenthal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is SERIOUS a good thing, Mr. Rosenthal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

