Comments on: Back on Base http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/03/19/back-on-base/ Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:18:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: avoice http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/03/19/back-on-base/#comment-528 avoice Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:45:52 +0000 http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/?p=464#comment-528 They should use the picture of the plane when they play the song "Bad Boys. Bad Boys." They should use the picture of the plane when they play the song “Bad Boys. Bad Boys.”

]]> By: dc http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/03/19/back-on-base/#comment-509 dc Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:42:29 +0000 http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/?p=464#comment-509 Not as a naval base. It was decommissioned in 1997. Not as a naval base. It was decommissioned in 1997.

]]> By: ng http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/03/19/back-on-base/#comment-504 ng Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:12:55 +0000 http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/?p=464#comment-504 Is that base active? Is that base active?

]]> By: eric http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/03/19/back-on-base/#comment-490 eric Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:36:57 +0000 http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/?p=464#comment-490 Another bird! Another bird!

]]>