<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back to the Future of Online Newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/01/29/back-to-the-future-of-online-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/01/29/back-to-the-future-of-online-newspapers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:18:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wordnerd</title>
		<link>http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/01/29/back-to-the-future-of-online-newspapers/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>wordnerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 13:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/?p=215#comment-117</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a newspaper if it doesn&#039;t blot up spilled coffee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a newspaper if it doesn&#8217;t blot up spilled coffee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dc</title>
		<link>http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/01/29/back-to-the-future-of-online-newspapers/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>dc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/?p=215#comment-110</guid>
		<description>It does still exist, but in very different form. It used to be a Hearst broadsheet, and was William Randolph Hearst&#039;s first flagship paper, but about a decade ago, Hearst bought the higher-circulation Chronicle, and sold off the Examiner. New owners transformed the Examiner into a tabloid, and now it  costs even less than 20 cents -- it&#039;s free. It&#039;s not much of a newspaper anymore, being more like one of those free commuter tabloids that have popped up in the last ten years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does still exist, but in very different form. It used to be a Hearst broadsheet, and was William Randolph Hearst&#8217;s first flagship paper, but about a decade ago, Hearst bought the higher-circulation Chronicle, and sold off the Examiner. New owners transformed the Examiner into a tabloid, and now it  costs even less than 20 cents &#8212; it&#8217;s free. It&#8217;s not much of a newspaper anymore, being more like one of those free commuter tabloids that have popped up in the last ten years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ng</title>
		<link>http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/2009/01/29/back-to-the-future-of-online-newspapers/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fragmentaryevidence.com/?p=215#comment-108</guid>
		<description>&quot;the twenty cent street edition&quot;!!
Does the Examiner still exist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the twenty cent street edition&#8221;!!<br />
Does the Examiner still exist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

